BLAME AMERICA? NO BLAME NEOCONS!

6

Pat Bagey Salt Lake Tribune

By Ron Paul

Is the current refugee crisis gripping the European Union “all America’s fault”? That is how my critique of U.S. foreign policy was characterized in a recent interview on the Fox Business Channel. I do not blame the host for making this claim, but I think it is important to clarify the point.

It has become common to discount any criticism of U.S. foreign policy as “blaming America first.” It is a convenient way of avoiding a real discussion. If aggressive U.S. policy in the Middle East — for example in Iraq — results in the creation of terrorist organizations like al-Qaeda in Iraq, is pointing out the unintended consequences of bad policy blaming America? Is it “blaming America” to point out that blowback — like we saw on 9/11 — can be the result of unwise U.S. foreign policy actions like stationing U.S. troops in Saudi Arabia?

In the Fox interview I pointed out that the current refugee crisis is largely caused by bad U.S. foreign policy actions. The U.S. government decides on regime change for a particular country — in this case, Syria — destabilizes the government, causes social chaos, and destroys the economy, and we are supposed to be surprised that so many people are desperate to leave? Is pointing this out blaming America, or is it blaming that part of the U.S. government that makes such foolish policies?

Accusing those who criticize U.S. foreign policy of “blaming America” is pretty selective, however. Such accusations are never leveled at those who criticize a U.S. pullback. For example, most neocons argue that the current crisis in Iraq is all Obama’s fault for pulling U.S. troops out of the country. Are they “blaming America first” for the mess? No one ever says that. Just like they never explain why the troops were removed from Iraq: the U.S. demanded complete immunity for troops and contractors and the Iraqi government refused.

Iraq was not a stable country when the U.S. withdrew its troops anyway. As soon as the U.S. stopped paying the Sunnis not to attack the Iraqi government, they started attacking the Iraqi government. Why? Because the U.S. attack on Iraq led to a government that was closely allied to Iran and the Sunnis could not live with that! It was not the U.S. withdrawal from Iraq that created the current instability but the invasion. The same is true with U.S. regime change policy toward Syria. How many Syrians were streaming out of Syria before U.S. support for Islamist rebels there made the country unlivable? Is pointing out this consequence of bad U.S. policy also blaming America first?

Last year I was asked by another Fox program whether I was not “blaming America” when I criticized the increasingly confrontational U.S. stand toward Russia. Here’s how I put it then:

“I don’t blame America. I am America, you are America. I don’t blame you. I blame bad policy. I blame the interventionists. I blame the neoconservatives who preach this stuff, who believe in it like a religion — that they have to promote American goodness even if you have to bomb and kill people.”

In short, I don’t blame America; I blame neocons.

RELATED ARTICLESMORE FROM AUTHOR

6 COMMENTS

  1. The Iraq fiasco was one of the biggest blunders in history and the world will feel the effects for decades. The bad thing is Israel is trying to drag us into another unwinnable war, this time with Iran. They need their man Jeb in there to make it happen.

    • I don’t think you’re reading the column Pressanykey. Just looking at the pictures.
      Ron Paul is as conservative as it gets, and this column is not anti-conservative. It says “stupid is, for some reason, popular with a small niche of the Republican Party.” You can’t deny that, and I noticed you didn’t PAK.

  3. In this column Ron Paul is talking about the total chaos, war and ISIS gripping the Middle East.
    What caused all this chaos? Bush/Cheney was in charge for 8 years….and
    BALLOONPILOT voted for Dick Cheney. Hell, BP would vote for Dick Cheney again!
    So on behalf of Balloonpilot, let’s ask Dick Cheney!! :
    “FROM C-SPAN:
    [Question:] Do you think the U.S., or U.N. forces, should have moved into Baghdad and remove Hussein?

    [Dick Cheney Answer:] No.

    [Question:] Why not?

    [Dick Cheney Answer:] Because if we’d gone to Baghdad we would have been all alone. There wouldn’t have been anybody else with us. There would have had to be a U.S. occupation of Iraq. None of the Arab Middle Eastern forces that were willing to fight with us in Kuwait were willing to invade Iraq.

    Once you got to Iraq and took it over, took down Saddam Hussein’s government, then what are you going to put in its place? That’s a very volatile part of the world, and if you take down the central government of Iraq, you could very easily end up seeing pieces of Iraq fly off: part of it, the Syrians would like to have to the west, part of it — eastern Iraq — the Iranians would like to claim, they fought over it for eight years.

    In the north, you’ve got the Kurds, and if the Kurds spin loose and join with the Kurds in Turkey, then you threaten the territorial integrity of Turkey.

    “It’s a quagmire if you go that far and try to take over Iraq.”

  4. There should be a limit on how many times one can post the exact same nonsense.

    • BALLOONPILOT
      Ha! You are making the ENTIRE point. Every. Single. Day, Balloonpilot…you say The. Exact. Same. Thing: “Obama-bad, Hillary-bad” You never cite any evidence, mind you. But everyday, you say The. Exact. Same. Damn. Thing.
      It is wholly ironic and preposterous that you would gripe about others doing that.
      (And I noticed you can’t deny who caused the war and ISIS disaster in the Middle East. In fact, Ron Paul in today’s column, explains it quite well. And BP…you still think these neocons are right! It is hilarious!!)

Comments are closed.