Adam Zyglis / Buffalo News
By Tom Purcell
Ah, the autumn is upon us. College campuses are buzzing with activity — as college kids and their parents rack up massive debt to cover the cost of high tuition.
The origin of such debt is interesting to trace.
In 1987, reports Slate, President Reagan’s secretary of Education, Bill Bennett, published a New York Times op-ed that blamed the growing cost of tuition on “greedy colleges†that raised tuition every time the federal government increased financial aid and the amount students could borrow — funds that were intended to help more kids get college degrees got swallowed up by universities looking to boost revenue.
Boy, did Bennett’s theory hold true in 1992. In that year, a sweeping change in federal lending laws greatly increased borrowing limits. The change opened the loan program to virtually everyone. In 1993 and 1994, borrowing increased 57 percent to a then-staggering $24 billion.
“From 1910 to about 1978, tuition fees rose about 1 percent a year adjusting for inflation,†writes Richard Vedder in Forbes. “Since 1978, fee increases have over doubled, to closer to 3 percent a year, reflecting the enormous growth in student loan and grant programs.â€
Today, nearly 37 million Americans owe roughly $1 trillion total in student-loan debt — most of it FEDERAL student-loan debt.
The informational nonprofit American Student Assistance says the average student-loan balance stands at around $24,300. Here’s a rough breakdown:
– 4.175 million borrowers owe more than $28,000.
– 1.67 million borrowers owe more than $54,000.
– 501,000 borrowers owe more than $100,000.
– 67,000 borrowers owe more than $200,000.
Many in academia say it is because their costs are rising. They say the government hasn’t increased funding fast enough. They say compliance with federal regulations is costly. They say they have to buy computers and other expensive tools to educate students.
What they don’t say is they have spent millions to attract pampered college kids to their schools.
Colleges have been on a spending spree, frantically trying to outdo their competitors. They’ve been building fancy food courts, Olympic-size pools and air-conditioned dorms. They boast some of the finest auditoriums and sports arenas in the world.
According to The Associated Press, many universities have been tearing down traditional dormitories in favor of upscale living quarters — posh facilities that offer private suites, granite countertops, designer furniture and satellite TV.
Today’s college kids don’t have to worry about much. Maid and laundry services are now available. Heck, kids don’t even have to pack up the station wagon when moving in. Moving companies do that for them.
Heck, many colleges and universities have spent millions improving everything but the quality of education.
In fact, the quality of education has probably gotten worse. In the old days, experienced professors routinely taught 12 hours of courses per week. Today nearly 30 percent of all professors at research universities teach fewer than four hours per week; what they do with the other 36 hours that most people work, nobody knows.
The real reason college tuition has kept going up is, believe it or not, because colleges have been able to keep raising it.
Why? Because for years, many parents and students believed that if they spend more for college, they must be getting a better, more prestigious product — and because easy borrowing has allowed millions of college kids to saddle themselves with massive debt payments upon graduation.
But now that so many graduates of premium-cost colleges are underemployed or still out of work, many are finally beginning to revisit that thinking. Is college worth the investment, many are asking.
In any event, Bill Bennett was right in 1987. Well-intentioned government programs have created a high-tuition, high-debt mess.
And it won’t stop until parents and their college-age kids stop enabling it
I very much an advocate of Education,–but lets get real,–it’s a BUSINESS,–that is currently well funded by the back door Corporate wellfare that the Student Loan Program represents to the “Business of Education”. The Students are being worked over as well as the Taxpayers who fund these enormous fees demanded by the Ivory Tower. Grade inflation, and 4 hrs of actual teaching by over 30% of the profession that Runs the “Company” is reaching the obscene, and there has to be a Ceiling placed on the Student loans/debt Load that is subsidizing this feasting on the bones of Our Young—in the guise/name of Education.
Instead of capping loans why not cap tuition?
Sounds good, but one would expect that if not controlled by a “Society of Mutual Understanding” that the “Market Place’ would have competition for Students keeping the Tuition within reason. It’s best we don’t hold our breath waiting for that to happen as long as tapping into the Taxpayer wallet prevails.
Comments are closed.