Home Blog Page 6593

Analysis: Answers could come soon on marriage amendment

3

By Lesley Weidenbener
TheStatehouseFile.com

Lesley Weidenbener, managing editor, TheStatehouseFile.com

Lesley Weidenbener, managing editor, TheStatehouseFile.com

INDIANAPOLIS – The biggest question about the upcoming session of the Indiana General Assembly is how legislative leaders will handle a proposed constitutional amendment to define marriage as the union of one man and one woman.

Analysis button in JPGReferred to by many as a ban on same-sex marriage, the proposal has already passed the legislature once. If it passes again, the amendment goes to the ballot for possible ratification by voters.

But it’s not been clear whether House Speaker Brian Bosma, R-Indianapolis, and Senate President Pro Tem David Long, R-Fort Wayne, plan to allow votes on the proposal at all. And recently, they’ve been avoiding the question.

That might be about to change – and the answer could affect the rest of the legislative session.

The leaders will be part of a panel Monday sponsored by the Indiana Chamber of Commerce, which has not taken a stand on the amendment. In past events, questions for the panel have typically come from the chamber’s president, Kevin Brinegar, and from business leaders in the audience.

It seems unlikely the same-sex issue won’t come up, particularly because the event is on the eve of the legislature’s Organization Day. That’s the official start of the 2014 session, although work won’t begin in earnest until January.

So even if the question doesn’t come up at Monday’s panel, it will certainly be posed by reporters on Tuesday.

Bosma and Long’s silence on the issue so far seems to indicate indecision about the issue among Republicans, who have quorum-proof majorities in both the House and Senate. That’s no surprise – but it is a change.

The marriage amendment passed easily – with both Republican and Democratic support – in 2011.

Then last year, the leaders announced they were postponing votes on the amendment because the U.S. Supreme Court was considering another state’s marriage laws. Bosma and Long said then that they planned votes in 2014 and expected the measure to pass.

But much has changed.

This summer, the high court struck down the federal Defense of Marriage law, essentially opening federal benefits to legally married, same-sex couples. However, the court said states could still impose bans.

A coalition of businesses and other organizations that oppose the amendment have nabbed some pretty high-profile members of late, including Indiana University, Ball State University, Emmis Communications and the Indy Chamber.  Already, two of Central Indiana’s biggest employers – Eli Lilly & Co. and Cummins Inc. – are on board.

 

Meanwhile, public opinion has been moving quickly, with more and more Hoosiers saying they either oppose the constitutional amendment or support same-sex marriage.

The WISH-TV/Ball State Hoosier Survey revealed last week that Hoosiers are split on the issue of legalizing same-sex marriage, with 48 percent supporting the idea and 46 percent opposing it – a statistical tie.

But the poll also found that just 38 percent of respondents support the marriage amendment while 58 percent are opposed.

Ball State political science professor Ray Scheele told WISH-TV that the opposition to the amendment is growing. “And that’s been true over the last couple of years,” he said.

Legislative leaders have some tough decisions to make about the proposal. We may find out soon which way they are leaning.

Lesley Weidenbener is executive editor of TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.

 

 

Commentary: Ritz, ed board & GOP leaders need to act like adults

1

By John Krull
TheStatehouseFile.com

John Krull, publisher, TheStatehouseFile.com

John Krull, publisher, TheStatehouseFile.com

INDIANAPOLIS – One of the most important lessons good parents teach toddlers is that not getting one’s way is no excuse for behaving badly.

Commentary button in JPG - no shadowIt appears that much of Indiana’s educational and political leadership never got that valuable piece of developmental training.

On Wednesday, a meeting of the Indiana Board of Education descended into – well, chaos would be too kind a term. Some hybrid of blood feud and epic temper tantrum would be closer to the mark.

Superintendent of Public Instruction Glenda Ritz closed and then walked out of the meeting after a board member made a motion she said was inappropriate and illegal. The board members, all of whom were appointed by Republican governors, accused Ritz of thwarting reform and unfairly using her position as chair to stifle discussion. Ritz accused Gov. Mike Pence, a Republican, of attempting to deny the will of the voters and take over education. Pence responded with a statement and an op-ed piece that made it seem as if Ritz’s conduct were something he needed to scrape off the bottom of his shoe.

By the time it was done, the Statehouse walls had been spattered with more mud than a happy hog would encounter in a lifetime.

There’s plenty of blame to go around in this debacle.

Let’s start with the board of education and their Republican backers.

Ever since Ritz won a surprise victory in last November’s election, defeating school choice darling Tony Bennett, the self-proclaimed education reformers have done everything they can to deny the reality of that vote. They have worked to curtail Ritz’s authority from the get-go – even engaging in the foolishness of saying at times that the voters’ verdict didn’t matter.

In addition to signaling contempt for the processes of self government, these advocates for choice have undercut their own message by suggesting that the only “choice” they’re willing to accept from voters and parents is the one that has their stamp on it.

If they were smart – a big if given the addiction to folly they’ve shown so far – Republicans would back off and force Ritz to try to push her own agenda rather than continuing to allow her to play Joan of Arc in resisting them. They have made her a much bigger presence than she ever could have made herself.

And then there’s Ritz.

If Republicans have been foolish and arrogant in refusing to accept a message from the voters, Ritz and her backers in the teachers’ union have been almost willfully delusional. They have interpreted her win last November as a mandate for her to assume powers over education policy a president in war time would envy.

What the Ritz crowd doesn’t get – or chooses to ignore – is that last November’s election wasn’t anything like a mandate for her.

What the voters did last fall was reject Tony Bennett, her Republican predecessor as state school superintendent. Voters didn’t like Bennett’s arrogance, his refusal to give any consideration to the views of anyone who didn’t agree with him completely and his impatient haste to disregard any information that might not support his approach to education.

Ritz was the instrument voters could use to register their opposition to Bennett. She was a handy club voters could use to beat a man they didn’t like and, in some cases, even despised.

But that doesn’t mean that the voters had any particular devotion to the club they used. Last year’s vote was more about Bennett than it was about Ritz.

It certainly wasn’t a groundswell of support to make Ritz into some sort of Bennett-in-reverse education czar.

The reality is that Hoosiers remain divided about education policy. They know they want good schools for their children, but they also want to know that the people responsible for their children’s futures have more on their minds than winning ideological or partisan battles. Hoosiers want to see the people in charge of the state’s schools work together.

The fact that the people charged with the responsibility for educating their children – and preserving their futures – are behaving like three-year-olds at a day care who have been fed too much sugar and denied their nap times isn’t likely to reassure Hoosiers that their kids are in good hands.

This is a situation that calls out for leadership.

The question is: Who is going to provide it?

John Krull is director of Franklin College’s Pulliam School of Journalism, host of “No Limits” WFYI 90.1 FM Indianapolis and publisher of TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.

 

Print Friendly

Health insurance agent faces state lawsuit for robocalling Hoosiers

0

greg zoeller
AG Zoeller urges consumers to sign-up for state’s Do Not Call list by Tuesday

INDIANAPOLIS – Indiana Attorney General Greg Zoeller said while Indiana residents welcome lower health insurance rates, agents using robocalls to solicit Hoosiers is illegal and their sales pitches may backfire.

Nearly 50 consumers filed complaints earlier this year after receiving robocalls or prerecorded phone messages offering affordable health insurance. Zoeller’s office determined the calls stemmed from Andrew D. Ross, a Nevada agent, who has a non-resident license in Indiana to sell insurance.

“With the recent rollout of the federal health care law, the number of callers soliciting discounted health insurance products will likely increase,” Zoeller said. “It’s important Hoosiers know what to look out for and don’t hand over personal information to unsolicited callers who have not been verified.”

In Indiana, most robocalls are illegal regardless of whether or not your number is registered on the Do Not Call list. Exceptions include calls from school districts to students, parents or employees and businesses advising employees of work schedules.

Zoeller filed a lawsuit against Ross in Marion County Superior Court on Thursday, for making at least 47 calls between January and May to residents across the state. According to the lawsuit, Ross is accused of violating the Indiana Telephone Solicitation of Consumers Act and the Indiana Regulation of Automatic Dialing Machines Act. The Attorney General’s office seeks civil penalties, investigation and prosecution costs, and to stop the illegal calls. Zoeller said the lawsuit has been forwarded to the Indiana Department of Insurance for their consideration.

If someone gets a call offering health insurance, they can verify the agent is licensed with the Indiana Department of insurance (IDOI) by checking here or by calling the IDOI consumer services division at 800-622-4461. Consumers can file insurance-related complaints by visitingwww.in.gov/IDOI.

Zoeller said consumers should be on alert for these types of calls with the recent rollout of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. For more information about scams and what to look out for visit www.IndianaConsumer.com/ACA.

The next quarterly deadline to register for the state’s Do Not Call list is Tuesday, Aug. 20. Consumers can register their residential landline, cell, VOIP or prepaid wireless numbers for free by visiting www.IndianaConsumer.com or by calling 1.888.834.9969. Individuals do not need to re-register unless their address has changed. Out-of-state area codes can also be added as long as the billing address is located in Indiana. Those consumers who are registered and receive an unwanted call can file a complaint with the Attorney General’s office by visitingwww.IndianaConsumer.com.

Zoeller said consumer complaints help the Attorney General’s office bring enforcement actions against violators and stop unwanted calls. Since 2009, the office has obtained 124 settlements or judgments against companies that violated Indiana’s telephone privacy laws. The total awarded to the state has been more than $20.5 million. Zoeller said the money collected is used to defray the cost of enforcing the state’s telephone privacy laws.

The Attorney General’s office also shares caller-ID numbers of suspected illegal telemarketers with companies that block spam callers for their customers. Zoeller said that while many investigations into the source of unwanted calls turn up empty due to internet-based technology most of the reported caller ID numbers are now being shared with companies that can use the numbers to block calls for their customers.

Zoeller thanked Deputy Attorney General Eliza Bradley for her work on the case against Ross and commitment to the Telephone Privacy Section within the Attorney General’s office.

 

IS IT TRUE

28

 

250px-Evansville_Indiana_-_Greyhound_Bus_StationIS IT TRUE it has also been nearly 2,000 days since that same former Mayor and his Director of Metropolitan Development Tom Barnett announced a deal with Historical Landmark Indiana to refurbish the old Greyhound Bus Station?  …because of Historical Landmark Indiana failure to follow its commitment  the Greyhound Bus Station it now considered to be schedule to a future  wreaking ball project.  …the results are similarly abysmal to those of the McCurdy as the old Greyhound Station is deteriorating and some days even sending forth foul odors that are reminiscent of a stroll through Bee Slough after a big rain?…it is in Evansville as it is in Washington true that government has lost its ability to do anything but push meaningless papers around and claim future victories to distract voters from the malaise of the present?

IS IT TRUE

4

 

mccurdy_10IS IT TRUE it has now been approximately 2,000 days since a smiling former Mayor announced to the people of Evansville that he had made a deal to get the McCurdy Hotel refurbished into 90 luxury apartments?…despite this premature announcement of a half baked project after 2,000 days the McCurdy looks like the Wreck of the Hesperus with broken windows and graffiti dominating its former imposing but now rotting shell?…many of our readers are beginning to believe that the McCurdy Hotel is destined for the wrecking ball because of neglect?

IN Supreme Court to allow cameras on Ntl. Adoption Day

0

 

statehouse_logo_final-graybackground-003-1By Jacie Shoaf

TheStatehouseFile.com

INDIANAPOLIS – In celebration of National Adoption Day, the Indiana Supreme Court will be allowing still photography, audio and video coverage of a select number of uncontested adoptions from Friday through Nov. 22.

Typically photography and audio and visual recordings aren’t permitted inside Indiana courtrooms. For this limited time – and for the purpose of raising awareness of the value of adoption – families and media may record the adoption events inside the courtrooms with the parties’ consent and at the judge’s discretion.  Recording and photography cannot interrupt court proceedings.

Jacie Shoaf is a reporter for TheStatehouseFile.com, a news website powered by Franklin College journalism students.

County Commissioners November 19th meeting agenda

0

AGENDA

Vanderburgh County    

Board of Commissioners 

November 19, 2013

5:00 pm, Room 301  

  1. Call to Order
  2. Attendance
  3. Pledge of Allegiance 
  4. Permission to Open: Quotes for Old Courthouse Guardrail
  5. Action Items
    • Road Race Requests:
      1. Run this Whey
      2. River Run
    • Veteran’s Council Presentation Regarding Old Courthouse War Monuments
    • First Reading of CO.11-13-012- 2014 Commissioners Meeting Dates Ordinance
    • Public Hearing/Final Reading of Vacation Ordinance CO.V-11-13-002: Vacation of 6’ PUE at 4910 Heckel Road
    • Contracts, Agreements and Leases
      1. Dental Clinic Lease Agreement Termination
      2. Juvenile Court: Independent Contractor Agreement with South Evansville Community Outreach
      3. Assessor:  Manatron, Inc. Letter of Authorization
      4. Commissioners: Purdue Cooperative Extension Services 2014 Agreement
      5. Sheriff:
        • Amendment to Aramark Agreement
        • ICJI STOP Domestic Violence Grant Agreement
  6. Department Head Reports
  7. New Business
  8. Old Business
  9. Public Comment
  10. Consent Items
    • Approval of prior meeting minutes: November 5, 2013
    • Employment Changes
    • Commissioners:  Transfer Requests
    • Building Authority: Permission to repair the Centre elevator
    • Early Retiree Reinsurance Program Notice
    • Engineer: Pay Request #185 for $300.00 for T.I.F. Projects
    • Assessor:  Request to Surplus Various Computer Equipment
    • Coroner: Request to Surplus Various Equipment
    • County Highway Work Review: Nov. 1 – Nov. 7
    • County Engineer Department Head Report
    • County Clerk:  October 2013 Monthly Report
  11. Adjournment 

ST. LOUIS CARDINALS TO ACQUIRE MEMPHIS REDBIRDS

3

 

th

ST. LOUIS CARDINALS TO ACQUIRE MEMPHIS REDBIRDS
The Memphis Redbirds Baseball Foundation today announced that it has reached a strategic agreement that would rescue the financially troubled Memphis Redbirds and AutoZone Park. The agreement calls for the St. Louis Cardinals to acquire the Memphis Redbirds and the City of Memphis to acquire AutoZone Park. The City would then lease the ballpark to the Redbirds through a long-term lease agreement. The agreement includes a significant capital investment in AutoZone Park to add features that will significantly improve the overall fan experience.The plan has the full support of the Foundation’s sole bondholder, Fundamental Advisors LP, who will retire the original bonds issued by the Memphis Center City Revenue Finance Corporation as part of the transaction. Fundamental has agreed to take a significant discount on the original principal amount of the bonds as part of this transaction. Mayor A C Wharton, Jr. and members of his administration have conducted extensive due diligence and will recommend the Memphis City Council approve the transaction during its December 3rd meeting. The agreement calls for the parties to close the transaction by December 31, 2013.

“We are thrilled that we are in a position to return the stadium back to the people of Memphis,” said John Pontius, treasurer for the Memphis Redbirds Baseball Foundation. “Our team will benefit from best-in-class leadership of the Cardinals. We want to thank everyone involved, and look forward to a bright future ahead as a part of this world-class organization.”

“The Redbirds represent the best of minor league baseball,” added William DeWitt Jr., Chairman and CEO of the St. Louis Cardinals. “This opens the door to countless new opportunities for our combined organization, and we are thrilled about the prospects for baseball fans in both of our great cities.”

Posey County receives over $600,000 to go towards improvements

0
Our community has been recognized twice in the last week for different grants that will boost our education system and economic development efforts. New Harmony was honored at the Statehouse as being one of 24 Hoosier communities to receive a part of more than $8 million in community development grants, and the Metropolitan School District of Mt. Vernon and North Posey County received grants to improve school security equipment.Funded with federal dollars from the Community Development Block Grant program, 21 communities received grants from the Community Focus Fund (CFF), and three communities received grants through the Main Street Revitalization Program (MSRP). Both the CFF and MSRP aim to assist smaller Hoosier cities and towns with long-term community development initiatives. While the MSRP focuses on refurbishing the downtown areas of each awarded community, the CFF covers a broader spectrum of community enhancement projects.

New Harmony was awarded over $500,000 to help build storm water infrastructure improvements through a CFF grant. The project in New Harmony consists of 3,820 linear feet of storm sewers, inlets and headwall structures.  The town is extremely flat making the surrounding hillsides steeply sloped causing runoff in rain events.  This project will eliminate flooding on streets, yards and basements that the residents and town have experienced for many years.

The grants are administered through the Office of Community and Rural Affairs which will assist community leaders during the 18-month implementation process. I will be recognizing the town of New Harmony for this achievement at their next town hall meeting on November 21. The meeting is at 5pm, and I encourage the public to attend.

The Secured School Safety Grant Program provides grants to school corporations and charter schools to improve safety measures, such as employing a school resource officer (SRO), conduct a threat assessment or purchase equipment to restrict access to the school or expedite the notification of first responders. Schools with an average daily membership of at least 1,000 students applied for grants up to $50,000 per year.  Schools with less than 1,000 students daily could apply for up to $35,000 per year.

I’m proud to say that the Metropolitan School District of Mt. Vernon received the full $50,000 grant, and the Metropolitan School District of North Posey received a $20,000 grant. Mt. Vernon school district plans to use the money it has received to improve school security equipment, while North Posey County school district plans to improve school security equipment and employ a school resource officer.

In the past month, our district has received over $600,000 to go towards improving our schools and towns. I would like to congratulate those who applied for these grants as I am excited to see the positive impact the money will have on our community and schools.