IS IT TRUE yesterday that we broke the local internet? ….the traffic to this website ranked as one of our busiest days of all time ?….the publisher was forced to expand his real estate in cyber space? ….if you were unable to read and comment yesterday, we apologize and invite you to try again today?
IS IT TRUE the Indiana Senate is poised to vote on repeal of our Common Construction Wage statute? ….State Representatives Holli Sullivan and Wendy McNamara cast their votes for repeal when the measure cleared the Indiana House? ….the history of state prevailing wage laws stem from the Davis-Bacon Act of 1931? ….the legislation mandates that local prevailing wages be paid for federally assisted public works construction projects?….there was a movement for state prevailing wage laws thereafter with 33 states taking such action, and Indiana passing prevailing wage legislation in 1935?….the Indiana Prevailing Wage Act, now known as the Common Construction Wage Act, was passed to establish wage rates paid to construction workers on public works projects in the state, with the wage rates determined by a board in the county where the project is located?….the boards are made up of five representatives from the local community: an industry representative appointed by the awarding agency, a labor representative appointed by the Indiana AFL-CIO, a contractor appointed by the Associated Builders and Contractors, a taxpayer appointed by the awarding agency and a taxpayer appointed by the County legislative body?….projects costing less than $350,000 and federally funded or partially federally funded are exempted?….private entities that receive tax credits or other economic development assistance from the state or local governments are also exempted?
IS IT TRUE the genesis of the Common Construction Wage law was to combat out-of-state contractors from the South who were entering the market and undercutting the bids of local contractors?….Indiana and local governments have laws which basically require that they accept the lowest bid?….public construction accounts for approximately one fourth of the construction market throughout the nation?….the requirement to take the lowest bid by public bodies creates downward pressure on wages, benefits and working conditions, along with the seasonal and temporary nature of construction projects?….construction workers are always working themselves out a job and are vulnerable to accepting reduced wages while they wait for another project?….at the same time, the skills necessary to build our buildings, roads and bridges require years of training and experience?….there is an inherent rub between the short-term relationship of public entities and contractors and creating incentive for contractors to invest in their workers?
IS IT TRUE the Common Construction Wage Act prevents government from using its substantial purchasing power to reduce wages and benefits in a community and is an example of one of this country’s oldest public policies to regulate labor markets?….by taking labor costs out of the equation of competitive bidding, contractors are left to compete based on productivity, quality, material costs, technology, management practices, logistics and profit margins?….stable wages are good for a community, as they incentivize the best and the brightest to enter the construction industry and they force businesses in the industry to train their workers to maximize productivity?….it is a myth that the law promotes only the interests of unionized construction workers?….studies done at both the federal and state level demonstrate that the prevailing wage is often set by non-union rates and union contractors are not typically higher bidders on projects than non-union contractors?….this myth in Indiana most likely stems from the high rate of unionization within the constructions trades in the state, which was 33% in 2013?….ultimately, there is no evidence that prevailing wage laws increase construction costs, and therefore repeal would not save money for taxpayers?….the real myth in this debate is that lower wages have no impact on productivity, quality, worker experience and worker skill?
IS IT TRUE that the potential to harm Indiana businesses and families is great if the Common Construction Wage Act is repealed?….over 90% of public projects in Indiana are completed by in-state contractors?….undermining a local labor market negatively impacts the ability of contractors and workers to support their family, and in turn the community?….repeal of the law would annually drain nearly $250 million dollars from other industries throughout the state, such as retail trade, health care and professional services?…..the existing law boosts the Indiana economy by about $700 million dollars a year by increasing consumer demand throughout the state?….the status quo also increases tax revenue to all levels of government with $21 million dollars in local and state tax revenue and $66 million in federal tax revenue from higher wages and increased spending?
IS IT TRUE that the current split in the Indiana Senate is 17 to 17 with 16 undecided or unknown?….it’s good for the soul to pick up the phone today and make 16 calls or send 16 emails?….the names of the Senators needing to hear from you and what you learned today are Pete Miller (3172329414 s9@in.gov); Chip Perfect (3172329541 s27@in.gov); Jeff Raatz (3172329488 s2@in.gov); Jim Smith (3172349426 s44@in.gov); Brent Steele (3172329814 s40@in.gov); Joe Zakas (3172329490 s11@in.gov); Ron Alting (3172329517 s22@in.gov); Phillip Boots (3172349054 s23@in.gov); Mike Delph (3172329541 s29@in.gov); C. Susan Glick (3172329493 s46@in.gov); Ron Grooms (3172349425 s18@in.gov); Randy Head (3172329488 s7@in.gov); Luke Kenley (3172329453 s14@in.gov); Dennis Kruse (3172330930 s25@in.gov); and Jean Leising (3172349054 s16@in.gov) ….I made my calls yesterday, and each call took less than one minute?  …our Mayor has quietly sent a letter to Indianapolis expressing his political opinion on this issue?….we hope that the Mayor’s letter will be made public?
IS IT TRUE I’ll be back tomorrow with some scathing commentary about something going on in our part of the world, but for today we should pull together for Indiana?….our readers from Indiana should make the calls or send the emails, because this change will impact everyone, and we should take a stand against such an act that lacks credibility?….we thank you for your support and look forward to bringing you the news in a way that not only brings you into the discussion but makes you feel compelled to participate?